As the dawn of the new year unfolds, a familiar narrative is once more taking shape in the tech world—namely, the public rivalry between Elon Musk and Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAIThis viral spat has reignited significant discourse among tech enthusiasts, investors, and the broader public.

On February 11, a buzz was created when it was reported that Musk, heading a consortium of investors, proposed an astonishing $97.4 billion bid to acquire the nonprofit segment of OpenAIMusk’s strategy includes merging this segment with his newly formed AI company, xAISuch audacious moves are characteristic of Musk, whose ventures often play into audacity wrapped in strategic vision.

The backdrop of this dramatic development hinges on a few key milestones in OpenAI’s journeyIn October 2024, OpenAI was rated at a staggering valuation of $157 billion after completing a $6.6 billion funding roundInterestingly enough, the company pledged to undergo a structural transformation, transitioning its for-profit model to a public benefit corporation (PBC) by the end of 2026. This unique hybrid structure aims to balance the dual mandates of nonprofit ideals alongside for-profit undertakings, which has turned out to be a contentious issue within the company.

A spokesperson and attorney for Musk, Marc Taberlof, expressed that the time has come to reestablish OpenAI as a company rooted in open-source principles and societal benefits. "We’ll ensure this vision is achieved," he stated, underscoring Musk's willingness to match or exceed any competitive offers that align with this agendaThe support for Musk’s acquisition comes from a well-versed group of investors such as Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital, and even prominent figures from Hollywood, like Ari Emanuel, CEO of Endeavor.

In a tongue-in-cheek rebuttal, Altman took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to respond to Musk’s offerHe quipped, “No thanks, but we would be interested in acquiring Twitter for $9.74 billion,” a clear reference to Musk's purchase of Twitter in 2022 for $44 billion before rebranding it as X

Advertisements

This playful jab reflects the ongoing animosity etched into their exchanges, where Altman also cleverly maneuvered by shifting the decimal point in Musk's suggested bid left by one place, playfully undermining its seriousness.

Adding another layer to this feud, Musk shared a brief video showcasing Altman declaring that he has no equity in OpenAIMusk captioned the footage with a play on Altman’s name, insinuating fraudulent motives, which drives a stark wedge between the two iconic tech figures.

The discord traces back to 2015, when both Musk and Altman co-founded OpenAI with the ambitious vision to develop AI as a force for good without the shackles of profit motivationHowever, philosophical differences and disagreements soon led to Musk’s departure from the board in 2018. As OpenAI shifted its focus towards profit-driven motives, particularly after establishing a profitable subsidiary aimed at attracting investments from tech giants like Microsoft, the foundational ethos began to unravel.

Since the emergence of ChatGPT, concerns have grown within Musk regarding the perceived pivot of OpenAI, focusing on maximizing profits over its foundational missionMusk has repeatedly criticized the company for veering off-course from its original ideals, raising points about the implications of its robust partnership with Microsoft.

In a legal twist, by late February 2024, Musk officially filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman, claiming they strayed from the organization’s original missionMusk’s legal action rooted itself in his substantial contributions to OpenAI, including over $44 million in donations between 2016 and 2020, alongside logistical support through office rental paymentsHis argument centers around the idea that the organization has lost touch with its foundational principles aimed at benefiting humanity, rather than focusing on profitability.

However, OpenAI responded with a public rebuttal via an article published on their website, which included a documentation of past communications with Musk

Advertisements

OpenAI asserted that Musk had, at one point, supported the model of a revenue-driven organization, even expressing desires to hold a majority stake and control over the boardThis counter-narrative pushed against Musk's criticisms, leading to further complications in their already fraught relationship.

Unraveling more facets of the controversy, it became apparent that Musk suggested OpenAI should "attach itself to Tesla,” a further indication of his vision to intertwine profit motives with technological advancementsHowever, after these negotiations fell flat, Musk exited the organization, claiming future prospects for OpenAI were near non-existent, only to subsequently launch his AI initiative, xAI, shortly after.

As the marketplace and society expects higher accountability and transformative change, OpenAI and Altman find themselves responding to external pressuresIn December of the previous year, they announced sweeping restructuring plans intended to manage both nonprofit and profit interests simultaneously within their organizational framework.

Notably, OpenAI's plan will transition its for-profit entity into a public benefit corporation in Delaware, facilitating necessary funding pathways toward achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) while managing day-to-day operational responsibilities with fresh governance modelsInvestors, predominantly those linked to earlier funding, will convert into shareholders of the new entity, while the nonprofit arm retains business stakes, albeit without active controlA significant aspect of this restructuring is aimed at maintaining a commitment to philanthropic endeavors in sectors including healthcare and education.

Musk’s unsolicited offer for the nonprofit portion of OpenAI has ratcheted up the complexity of Altman’s dual-structure restructuring effortsAn essential challenge remains determining how to fairly value the nonprofit segment, especially amid market fluctuations and the contentious dispute with Musk.

Earlier in January, reports also surfaced revealing that Musk's legal representatives sought intervention from the attorneys general of California and Delaware, pushing for a public assessment of OpenAI's assets to establish a fair market value for its nonprofit component

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements